3v3 rant
So people can debate if the move to Crystals to GAC was good or bad (i personally am ambivalent to this ) , as many people fall on both sides of this , that is not what this about - this about tha...
Forum Discussion
"Lumiya;c-2361063" wrote:"NicWester;c-2361022" wrote:"Lumiya;c-2360984" wrote:"Ghost666;c-2360982" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2360976" wrote:
I think there would be more variety if we had a place to test things. Some people are happy to try new things in GAC, and that's great. But for me, I'm not comfortable throwing caution to the wind in a competitive game mode.
Thats just it...competitive does not mean "risk free"...thats the fun of it (for me)...taking risks and living with the result. Sports in general does not allow "testing" beforehand what the opponent will do...and they are fun due to that :)
In sports you train... a lot. Especially if it is befire something important. You can't do that for GAC and that's the difference.
Okay but by now there have been eight million 3v3 GACs so…
There are always new players some people seem to forget. How are they supposed to get the hang of it? Especially now that they are/can also be matched against more experienced players. And while there might be videos and other sources, a game should provide all the basics you need to be able to play said game without having to do hours and hours of research outside of the game. The game should provide the ability to learn and train itself. More than ever now since crystals are tied to it.
Also, there have not been that many 3vs3's.
You don't have to go outside of the game, all the information you need is in the kits. its just easier to go elsewhere and take advantage of others work theorycrafting and testing over time. Just like with TB, and TW omicrons, and conquest strategies, and GC strategies, and GL counters, and.....
