3v3 territory war cancelled...
It looks like from the make good post, which sux for me as I was looking forward to that one the most this month 😢
Forum Discussion
"kristian1311;c-1862316" wrote:"Crackling_Doom;c-1862289" wrote:"kristian1311;c-1862283" wrote:"Crackling_Doom;c-1862262" wrote:"Botzone1;c-1861837" wrote:
Thank god for that.
You seem to be in the minority here. Unlike you, some people here like change, competition and strategizing.
Eh, competition and strategizing is a weak draw for me in this game. Just like I wouldn't be particularly inclined to play chess against someone who bought additional queens or something.
lIf strategy was going to be paramount in TW and GA, CG could give everyone set rosters for use in TW and GA. That would be some pretty cool theory crafting and strategy. An actual level playing field. And getting to play teams you haven't been able to build yourself.
Having it based on everyone's personal roster isn't terrible, I still have fun in TW, but it's mostly down to who has the most meta dominance.
Inb4, i realize "roster development" is part of someone's long term strategy. But that's been a weak position ever since CLS came out, we've been led by the nose through metas ever since. It is impossible to "strategically" develop a roster, merely to "efficiently" build to the current/next meta.
Why do you believe that?
It's like the epitome of balanced matchmaking, actual identical teams. The strategy would come down to creating the right mix of offense/defense and anticipating effective team compositions.
There could be territory or character restrictions imposed to force variation of teams without screwing over people's individual collections.
It wouldn't be perfect either but it'd be a step towards more strategy and less on matchmaking and roster checks.
But that's not even me saying I would like it better. Just annoys me how much people claim the current setup is strategy.
If this were a 1-time event, I’d be more inclined to agree with you. But the strategy comes into play when you consider that it’s a recurring event.
Over time you should be learning new counters, adapting to what you see, growing your roster, re-modding teams, etc. to be more competitive.
You can say that “we have been led by the nose” in roster development - but does that mean that everyone else you face has the same roster then? Do you have the same separatist, galactic republic, OR, etc. setup as everyone you face? I know that I don’t - and what I see in GA and TW is what drives me to decide how to prioritize those teams.
Your chess analogy would be more accurate if each player could choose which pieces they added to their set in place of others.
There are tons of resources around for interested players to learn and improve with.
