3v3 territory war?
Anyone else notice the last TW in May is listed as 3v3? That should be.... interesting.
Forum Discussion
"IDinDooNuffin;c-1850736" wrote:"yohann269;c-1850410" wrote:
3v3 TW is a horrible idea. The people who say don’t join obviously don’t plan highly competitive TWs. Those of us who do have no desire for 3v3. Just think how hard it is dealing with one DR/BSF/Malak squad in GA then multiply that by 50. There is no grinding that down. On top of that it’s planned for a holiday weeeknd in the US so you will have huge availability problems. Please @CG_SBCrumb reconsider this plan.
Current guild is 48 and 3. Id say we plan pretty well.
Dont join if its too much work.
What's your guild's GP? Will you see 50 DR/Malak squads from your opponent? Have you faced DR/BSF/Malak in GA? Not joining is not an option. as others have said if you don't join TW, why even play the game. That's my opinion. I like TW, I like the competitive nature of it. I get on board with bonuses, because it does make you plan for different teams. I even supported the Thanos TW. Afterwards I hated it. I don't mind 3v3 GA, because if you at least try you will get 2nd place rewards. But the effort and coordination of TW is completely different.
