3v3 TW

"OmegaIV;c-2446553" wrote:


Right now, it's stale and just needs to either be revamped or removed.

I don't disagree. I would welcome a change. Just not one that involves 3v3,

"OmegaIV;c-2446553" wrote:

Here's the issue with TW - The difference in rewards between 1st and 2nd are so minuscule, that what's the point?

That's the best thing about TW

"TVF;c-2446575" wrote:

"OmegaIV;c-2446553" wrote:

Here's the issue with TW - The difference in rewards between 1st and 2nd are so minuscule, that what's the point?

That's the best thing about TW

Truth!
Means you really don't have to care

"PlayerJ;c-2446667" wrote:
The reason I like the idea of a 3 vs. 3 for TW is because it could have some heroes be great Solo Attackers.

Wampa & Savage are great in GAC.

I was thinking Fulcrum might be great Solo hero in 3 vs. 3 set up.
Also, I would like to see Darth Sidous be Solo team in TW.

Also, it might cause other set ups to be created in TW in a 3 vs. 3 situation.

Fulcrum can already solo a few teams with her omi in TW now.

There are plenty of team dynamics to learn without turning an already lackluster game mode into a hard pass for a significant portion of players.

My guild is typically on the hook for 46+ teams per zone. Can you imagine how many there would be in 3v3? Aint nobody got time for that. People really need to think this through before cheering for a change that would do nothing but increase burnout for people that engage, reduce engagement for people that refuse, and put a heavier load on guild leaders and officers.