Again about the rivals (GA). Tired of it.
And again the old question. How are rivals selected? Is it really not understand that 100k of difference is a lot? See the difference in level 13 and modules. Why is the GP only t...
Forum Discussion
"OBoogieIII;c-1953592" wrote:
@Waqui 4-8 big spenders? No. 4-8 big to moderate spenders? Yes.
In the post, I refered to, you wrote this:
"OBoogieIII;c-1953435" wrote:
The reason behind this, is the top 4 are all big spenders.
So, which is it? What's you claim?
3-4 matches, per Round, that I personally have been put in are unwinnable. Not difficult to win, literally unwinnable. I’ve used my entire roster to beat one team and couldn’t even make a dent in the team.
If you really can't win more battles than 3-4 every round, you should either rethink your strategy (keep your strong counters for offense) or investigate which counters to those team are out there. Farm/gear/mod one those counters.
You can't really blame matchmaking for your own deficiencies.
Personally, I don’t think that should ever happen. Win or lose, I should be able to have something on my roster that could defeat the team I’m up against.
I agree. However, I believe we don't quite agree on who/what is to blame for this.
If it’s about strategy, I should be able to strategically put some team together from my current roster to win.
Or you should be able to strategicaly plan and choose which characters and teams to gear/farm/mod. Preparing well in-between GAs is also part of a winning strategy.
If not, then why not just give them an automatic win and not waste our time?
If you keep loosing that many battles every round, why don't you just farm stronger teams? Your problem doesn't seem to be the matchmaking algorithm.
