"taquillasun;c-1878534" wrote:
"Kyno;c-1877865" wrote:
This same concept comes up every time there is new content.
New content tends to stir things up, but in the end stable/healthy guilds usually make it through.
Those changes didn't typically effect the actual GP needed to do events.
This is a completely unfair comparison. I find this very disingenuous.
The concept is a guild being able to complete the event. It is absolutely a fair comparison.
Players leaving because they dont want to wait for a guild to meet X criteria to be able to complete the new content. This time it is GP, other times it has been X number of a certain team or other benchmark, but the concept is exactly the same.
