"Kyno;c-1878554" wrote:
"taquillasun;c-1878534" wrote:
"Kyno;c-1877865" wrote:
This same concept comes up every time there is new content.
New content tends to stir things up, but in the end stable/healthy guilds usually make it through.
Those changes didn't typically effect the actual GP needed to do events.
This is a completely unfair comparison. I find this very disingenuous.
The concept is a guild being able to complete the event. It is absolutely a fair comparison.
Players leaving because they dont want to wait for a guild to meet X criteria to be able to complete the new content. This time it is GP, other times it has been X number of a certain team or other benchmark, but the concept is exactly the same.
The concept is able to complete the event? I think the Dev post said the goal is to give guilds something to strive for. A goal. Of course we all want to complete the event. But guilds won't even get the chance to participate and try the event unless their guild meets a certain required galactic power.
It's not a fair comparison as there as far as I know only a 25 man guild roster requirement for Territory wars. And None for Territory battles.
There were no restrictions for HAAT or Rancor.
Don't get me wrong, I'm open to wait and see. And I'm not trying to be a badger on you. I see you post here often.
You don't strike me as someone without reason. However, on this one, and this particular topic, I'm kinda thrown off by your responses.
Capital Games Team
