"Nauros;c-2012560" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-2012559" wrote:
"Monel;c-2012508" wrote:
"TVF;c-2012469" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-2012345" wrote:
I would trade all that swag for a Mace rework. :'(
I wouldn't.
Agreed. A reworked Mace doesnt equal a good Mace.
That makes no sense. The current Mace is trash. So he will have to be reworked to be good. They might miss the mark, but it provides a higher than 0% chance of him being improved. In fact he is so bad it would be really hard not to make him better even on accident.
Better-than-now Mace still doesn't equal actually good Mace.
Better than now Mace > current garbage
And then he might actually be usable in the content designed around his biggest moments in the movies. He was NEVER going to be great/meta. The key to happiness is lowered expectations. I would have been happy with Dooku/Nute/Geonosian levels of utility. Most of their reworks have been at least solid/useful. (Some have even been near top tier like General Grievous.)
However, CG never fails to disappoint. After leaving Mace out of the CW content, I don’t ever want to hear them call themselves fans again.