Another bug in the Malak „solution“?

"Nikoms565;c-1993345" wrote:

"Kyno;c-1993304" wrote:

"Nikoms565;c-1993299" wrote:

"Kyno;c-1993154" wrote:

"Nikoms565;c-1993145" wrote:

"Noxfire27;c-1993099" wrote:

"Kyno;c-1993095" wrote:

"Gilgasmash;c-1993056" wrote:
Don't let this thread die, as this is a huge problem in the game now: Players, who shouldn`t be able to equip 6*-mods, have an advantage at the moment (up to +7 speed, higher offense/defense-stats and so on). Also, some players still have g12-gear, whereas their Malak's only a 6*. This has to be fixed immediately.

The mods are stated to be intended, probably the same for the gear.

Just because they say it’s „intended“ doesn’t mean it’s somewhere fair And/or a good solution. its just not right. And leaves a very bad taste after this huge Malak mess.

Let's be honest - in this case, "intended" just means they don't know how to fix it. They certainly didn't say " How about we let bugged Malaks keep 6* mods". "Intended" is just spin to cover ineptitude. It was never intended. As far as I'm concerned, we don't need more communication if it's going to be dishonest drivel like that.

That's not true, but I know I'm not going to convince anyone of that. The reason is far simpler than that.

Kyno
Care to elaborate? If it's simple, then by all means, explain. Or have you also been reduced to vague, non-committal "communication" as well?

They know how to fix it, it is that simple. They didnt due to the work involved and the idea that they wanted to touch our rosters as little as possible.

It would have created way more "work" to get things back to actual square 1 (before the event) and would have created more issues to do this. They knew (I believe they knew from how they talk about it) this would be the final state of things.

The point of me being vague is that I don't expect anyone to care, as apparently any communication on this matter has been reduced to "dishonest drivel".

So, if I am understanding you correctly, the resulted 6* mods staying on Malak was not necessarily the intent, but due to the amount of work it would take (especially given the short amount of time before GAC lock) and the possible issues it would create, was simply a consequence that had to be accepted.

Incidentally, your point and take on it is completely believable - and not at all "intended" as Crumb seemed to indicate.

Nice strawman by you on the "dishonest drivel" comment dig by you by the way. If you're going to quote me, at least keep it in context. You're better than that.

I think the most telling thing about all this is that 6* mods remaining on 5/6* malaks and G12 gear remaining on 5/6* malaks would be an identifiable issue within 10 minutes of any meeting CG would have had about the roll back.

It is something that should have been mentioned in the first or second communication on the matter. It was not and that’s just more evidence of just how inept this shop is.