"Boo;c-1608047" wrote:
"YaeVizsla;c-1607977" wrote:
a"Boo;c-1607820" wrote:
Both Ventress and Savage were aspiring sith lords (the Rule of 2 only applies to Sith Lords)
Rule of Two only applies when those involved choose to obey it.
It gets broken all the time.
Ill be nice and re-post it for you to read:
Ventress was a Sith Assassin... .... warrants a Sith tag.
Right on the spot! That nails it perfectly and fits to our before mentioned idea that 3 versions of Ventress are required to fit her storyline while following the rule of the sith.
So the first Asajj should be the Sith - Separatist "Assasin Ventress" (since Dooku explains sidious that she is only his assasin)
The second Asajj should be the "Nightsister Ventress" (after Dooku betrayed her and she swore herself to defeat him)
The third master should be the Scoundrel/Bounty hunter "Exile Ventress" (after loosing against Dooku's army and General Grievous).
Maul therefor should get another Char too, being called Cyborg Maul referring to his times when his Brother found him. This would be a Scoundrel/ Sith char, since he planned to take over the role as a sith lord as you correctly stated. But i am not sure if this still is the case after Sidious killed Savage. What do you think @Boo?
Also i dont think plagueis is snoke. Not even a chance of 1 % that he is. If sidious betrayed him he would have been there to take revenge or at least try to. And not just wait till sidious dies and then take over the empire (First Order) . That is not the way of the Sith. Furthermore Papa Palpa clearly says that he killed his master and I doubt he would make a mistake in doing such a risky thing.
For me snoke is just another stupid mistake of the new movies. The same boring irrelevant fact like rey's background and the fact that TFA spoilers the map to find Luke when he is needed and TLJ shows he just wants to be on the island drinking alien milk waiting for his death. But that is another discussion.