Bossk is why we hate ships.
Hear me out. I have made several meta fleets around Bossk's ship. I'm sure you have too. Yes I know there are ways to take him out but think about this. What if his ship did not exist (at least not as...
Forum Discussion
"thecarterologist958;c-2052103" wrote:"ZAP;c-2052090" wrote:
It’s funny, I watched a video last night of an interview of a person and the interviewer asked if they could ever disagree without insults and just have differing opinions. The interviewee basically said no way Jose, which is what you’re saying to me.
I never made a baseless claim, just followed up on baseless claims by people who tried to make the OP look foolish. None of them provided any data whatsoever to back up their claim that HT is not OP, that’s what I call “baseless claims”, obv you don’t.
I provided data that I feel supports my claim, but am willing to concede that the data means something different to you and others, aka “meta”, not “OP”.
Definitions are by definition defined, it isn't a matter of opinion, but you already knew that, nice story though. You never have to prove that something is not true, there is no reason to believe it without evidence being provided as with the drop rates you have brought up, something you have failed to do based on the definitions of the words you have used."ZAP;c-2052090" wrote:
Ridicule me all you want, but at least I have made coherent arguments as to why I agreed with OP and felt compelled to stand up against one word “denied” responses like TVF always gives.
But we live in a catchy sound bite world now and most people identify with those one word degrading, sarcastic responses to people.
Disagree."ZAP;c-2052090" wrote:
And for clarities sake, I fight and beat HTs at least 5x a day in fleet, so my views on this matter have nothing to do with my personal anecdotal opinions, was just looking at the best overall data I could find that wasn’t anecdotal feely opinions.
But hey, you win the internet and I’m a complete **** who doesn’t know anything, good for you.
Yet when people questioned the validity of that data, you insulted them and claimed you "felt" otherwise, only to completely cave and refuse to provide any answers once people elaborated and asked you questions you presumably didn't have answers for.
If you wish for a more polite and reasoned discussion, this is perhaps not the best initial response."ZAP;c-2051958" wrote:
Oh cool, I get to out and own 3 of you now.
Prove your point with data or not, isn’t that what you require of me? Otherwise it’s just opinions on either side and my data shows your side is dead wrong. I’m done arguing with you, as you’re incapable of providing any data for your argument vs mine: you’ll win though, cause you’re the best!
