So, I can only assume this is along the lines of how CG is operating then?
"Any 3 bounter hunter ships"
Dev 1: There, I posted the Falcon requirements.
Boss dev: How has the TW toon ban post been received by the community? I know the community will be happy we are listening to their feedback?
Dev 1: yeah, we closed a thread. Reopened a new one and we've had another 19 pages of comments. Still not really any supportive ones.
Boss dev: ok, well, to show them we're listening lets change any 3 to any 4 for the Falcon unlock.
Dev 1: ok. why?
Boss dev: because we're listening. And its still any 4, see, we pre-emptively removed the other bounty hunter ships before we made them available. They can spend all that time pretending to unlock a ship, and so, in listening to their feedback that we shouldnt ban toons, now they wont complain that we arent preventing them from using as we just wont make it available to start with. I mean thats what they asked for in territory wars, isnt it, to have something 'crazy', like not having iconic toons and ships available to use in game. We can do that here without having to vote.
Dev 1: so we're not going to release those ships for dengar, greedo, aurra. Or the toons and ships for zuckuss and 4-LOM?
Boss dev: no, see, we're listening to them. We've just gone ahead and removed them before they have to 'vote' on whether they get to use them after they farm and unlock them. It saves us having to code anything and use the player base to test anything now. We're streamlining our production line.
Dev 1: got it. Its star wars. They will fall for anything.
