Forum Discussion
ccmoose
2 years agoRising Novice
"Screerider;c-2401154" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2401114" wrote:Well, not really. I doubt the Testing Team was given a requirement that Omi-Traya shouldn't beat LV, but that non-Omi Traya should continue to be able to beat LV. An Omi shouldn't make a team worse.
That would still be a failure of testing. If the results of the play test are not passed along to and approved by all the relevant parties, then the testing process as a whole failed.
You're arguing semantics here.
Their review could be based on a section of the player base's reaction to the Omi, and someone at EA or CG raising the concern.
I'm not really sure what you're arguing here.
If no changes are made to Traya, then I think your second paragraph is feasible. As an aside, CG should more clearly communicate what they're looking into and why as those details (or lack thereof) could influence player behavior.
If changes are made, then there was a failure at some point in the process--call it testing, QC, interdepartmental communication, whatever--but it would suggest that their system failed in this instance.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
78,397 PostsLatest Activity: 4 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 48 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago
- 3 hours ago