CANCEL GAC

Cancel and give me* all first place rewards.

I’ll be waiting :)

CG, where they trash their game and still take your money lmao

Good job on pushing a breaking update right at the start of GAC... smh

"Carthric;c-2331974" wrote:

"bap1234;c-2331941" wrote:
i think zam omni is bugged, 314 gas went before ?

Her text got changed to reflect how she actually functions. The text now informs us that she is excluded in the stats she shares.

UNIT - Fixed an issue in which the Level 8 upgrade description for Zam Wesell’s Shapeshifter Unique ability was missing the word “Other”. It now should read: “While in Grand Arenas: Zam instead gains 60% increases to her Offense, Max Health, and Max Protection. Zam gains 5% Speed for each other Bounty Hunter ally. Other Bounty Hunter allies gain 20% of Zam's current Offense, Max Health, Max Protection, and Speed until the first time she is defeated."

In short we were incorrect to assume that she also gained the 20% she shares.

Wasn't this just how everyone ran stat calculations with her anyway?

I don't think the consensus was that Zam shared the last part with her self.I can see how someone could read it that way, but content creators were calculating speeds in her in their streams.
It is a bit strange though, most character design in the game is excellent, but the wordings are almost always really bad, clumsy and ambiguous. CG needs to define their gaming language* and then go over every single toon and reword them.
* Look at board games or Magic the Gathering for inspiration.

"DK_Raid_Violator;c-2332015" wrote:
I don't think the consensus was that Zam shared the last part with her self.

I mean it definitely doesn’t help when there’s wording like this which factor in all the units on the team and not just the allies.

CG is bad at communicating in all aspects of the game, which is the root cause of every other problem.
My guess is that their poor testing/qa also boils down to bad internal communication. If it isn’t clear what the outcome is supposed to be how do you know that the tests have failed?

"HumbleMumble;c-2332020" wrote:
My guess is that their poor testing/qa

This made me giggle. As if they have testers and didn't use their customers to do the testing.

If their internal communication is as poor as their external communication, it’s no surprise these mistakes happen.

"Ghost666;c-2332114" wrote:
Question...am i mistaken to think QGJ was overpowered?
SO...if OP, should it not be fixed?
(OFC...it should NOT be nerfed into uselessness...not sure if it was...)

BTW...i used all my omicrons on QGJ...so i also lost with this...BUT it was far too strong...
(I am MORE wary that omicrons will REMOVE fun from game due to OP cases)

Maybe it was too strong, but like most changes it was nerfed by hitting it repeatedly with a proverbial sledgehammer. Smaller changes could have prevented JKA from one-shotting GLs.