Captain Drogan
I don't have any issue with CG creating a character from thin air, just as long as they add to the lore. He's not a main character, but him just "being there" on Endor would be pretty lame. A couple o...
Forum Discussion
"BubbaFett;c-2437160" wrote:"dogwelder79;c-2437155" wrote:"Ultra;c-2437146" wrote:
it’s a good thing Drogan is a fictional character or else he’d be in tears over how much bullying people are doing to him for being different
That’s a very serious accusation. Can you provide examples?
It was CG who said "hey look everybody, we've created a toon with a limb difference!"
Players mostly answer: "we already respect differences, the problem is you could have chosen hundreds of characters from the lore and instead you invented a new one".
Except CG never said that, in fact other than the brief blurb in the marquee event and a couple of sentences in the character announcement CG was pretty low key about it, which is more than I can say for some of the outraged players that posted vitriol in this thread that subsewuently had to be deleted....
If some players prefer lore and canon characters only, then that is their preference.... They aren't the only ones playing the game though.... That being said, specifically taking exemption to a character that was created to be inclusive of diabilities is pretty low...
I also dislike 50R-T. What’s the accusation now?
Also, something else I disagree with. I don't have a problem with Drogan having a limb difference. I have a problem with CG making it important. Inclusivity is not pointing it out, inclusivity would have been to invent that same toon without stressing his difference. They could have said "we needed a toon with these abilities for Leia and there is none in lore".
