Character shards from Bounty Hunter event

No I understand now, I was just saying that it does imply that word. That was the wrong word to describe it.

All of our other battles that have 2 waves or more that give the exact same prize don’t have the word shared after it. It’s the wrong word to use for that. Matter of fact, the only other time I’ve seen shared is from the special missions on Territory battles. Hers why I think it’s the wrong word to use: my victory count was 20, who is it shared with, I can’t share something with myself. I do see what they wer trying to say though, just a horrible way of explaining it

"JDIII;c-1534837" wrote:
it says right after victory count that it’s shared.

Um, yes. That the victory count is shared, not the rewards. It means you have two "victories" available. As soon as you succeed in any tier, that count goes to one across all tiers. Succeed again and that count goes down to zero...across all tiers.

Anyone who applied a little logic to the situation should have been able to figure that out regardless. With 50 members in a guild, shared rewards could potentially mean 1000 shards for every member of that guild. That's ludicrous! And also, as soon as you beat a tier, you received rewards...which should have been a pretty big tip-off.

Yeah, as I stated in the previous message I understand what they were trying to imply

It's not a guild event, so it's a bit of a leap to go from "shared" to "shared rewards for the guild". No individual event works this way.

I am a little disappointed that we don't get 2 free attempts going forward. The bounties are tough enough that a refresh is not a guaranteed 10 shards. The IPD bounty took me a dozen or so attempts to get. We'll probably end up with the same 800-900 crystal refresh cost as the Fleet Mastery or Wicket/Talzin events, and I'd hate to spend 800 and not get the RNG that day for the shards I want. I hope they reconsider this.

So people complained when CG didn’t explicitly state in prior events that had the same shared victory structure and now people complain again when CG put those wordings in? What a surprise /sarcasm.

"Vorgen;c-1534877" wrote:
So people complained when CG didn’t explicitly state in prior events that had the same shared victory structure and now people complain again when CG put those wordings in? What a surprise /sarcasm.

This. They went to explicitly say, in the most visible way possible, that victory counts were shared, to expressly state that. It really takes the « leaping to conclusions » very far to say it implies the rewards are shared across the guild.
Moreover, I’m pretty sure the « Details » and « Required units » screens had the same mention of Victory counts : shared.

Yeah, what a far leap... Trolls everywhere