"BentWookiee;373265" wrote:
"Zama_Zeckur;373235" wrote:
No offence to anyone, but leader boards based on speed of spending to be able to do it doesn't seem like a feat to me. If there was no monetary purchases, I'm sure it would not have happened so fast.
@BentWookiee it's weird to see a mod in a guild. Especially if there is a chance of biased towards other posters against it.
Why weird? Mods play the game, all of us are in guilds.
I try to be pretty fair. I have edited & trashed many of my members threads. Being a Mod and being a member of a guild are two separate things. TBH being a mod makes it HARDER.. see for instance right now my reaction would be to say something like "Can't you find SOMETHING ELSE to whine about.. Just be happy for people don't make this a F2P vs. P2P *thing*" ..but instead I find myself in a position where I have to answer accusations of bias where there is none.
:)
Actually I just said it was weird and there could be a chance. Never accused you specifically.
Also, some forum modding is done without any response or reasons, so we never know what the truth behind it is.
And behind the f2p/p2p. I didn't comment about f2p not hitting leaderboards. Just saying that spenders will always win when it comes to firsts.
We know they will so no point in useless leader boards for boasting about wallets.
