Conquest 10
@CG_Doja_Fett_MINI hi,
Will Conquest 10 have such a long break like C7,8,9?
Will Conquest 10 have such a long break like C7,8,9?
Forum Discussion
- There is currently no planned delays for Conquest 10. Should be starting in the first half of next month, on more of the "normal" schedule.
"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308562" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308489" wrote:
"khdelboy;c-2308481" wrote:
I’m more interested if they will revise the changes to the conquest especially the energy needed for one battle, lt that I have any much hope they will do so.
Also the new conquest toon. Not interested in Maul (it will be a long time before I go for LV and I wouldn’t bother with a mando faction for a while.)
There are changes coming, but I wouldn't expect to see things like that change, it will likely be around the feats and some organization things there. But we will have to wait and see what actually makes it into the next set.
So basically they aren’t going to listen to the feedback and just serve up more hot garbage?
I guess they’ve been monitoring the engagement level and are happy with the outcome. I also believe CG interprets engagement in different metrics than a player would.- The previous 3 conquests are just way too grindy, I got the 2nd best crate in hard mode, it was just for the R8 stuffs but it was not fun, and way too time consuming. I don’t think I can continue to do that, I got a lot of things to do
Energy and stamina really dictate when I can play and that’s another big issue.
My guild became less active since those recent changes(nerf and conquest). "loveremoval;c-2308554" wrote:
My standard JMK team easily counters LV with Maul. I auto after I have taken out RG
I have not yet beaten JMK teams with r8 LV and r7 Maul
Well, it should be that way, since Kenobi has the high ground and Lord Vader insists on attacking him anyway...- I hope they see my engagement of doing no battles for the last 2-3 days after getting the best crate I could without dying from boredom.
- I like Conquest well-enough, but does anyone else find it unsettling that every 3 months or so they're going to release anither ship or character that's this strong? It's gone from power creep to power surge.
"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308562" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308489" wrote:
"khdelboy;c-2308481" wrote:
I’m more interested if they will revise the changes to the conquest especially the energy needed for one battle, lt that I have any much hope they will do so.
Also the new conquest toon. Not interested in Maul (it will be a long time before I go for LV and I wouldn’t bother with a mando faction for a while.)
There are changes coming, but I wouldn't expect to see things like that change, it will likely be around the feats and some organization things there. But we will have to wait and see what actually makes it into the next set.
So basically they aren’t going to listen to the feedback and just serve up more hot garbage?
Or we can wait to see what changed before jumping to conclusions.- just read the responses above specifically related to conquest and have to say that i agree completely. after the latest changes, conquest is a horrible grind and absolutely melts away any ambition i have to play it which in turn affects my enthusiasm for every other part of the game. man cg please please fix it. change it back. blow up the crazy feats. fix the matchups so factions like phoenix that arent normally very powerful dont blow up much better teams. the matchups are too hard to predict. make it easier to use data discs. why do some accounts get better data disc options? this shouldnt be random. so much about what was fun and interesting from conquest 1.0 is gone.
"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308729" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308618" wrote:
"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308562" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308489" wrote:
"khdelboy;c-2308481" wrote:
I’m more interested if they will revise the changes to the conquest especially the energy needed for one battle, lt that I have any much hope they will do so.
Also the new conquest toon. Not interested in Maul (it will be a long time before I go for LV and I wouldn’t bother with a mando faction for a while.)
There are changes coming, but I wouldn't expect to see things like that change, it will likely be around the feats and some organization things there. But we will have to wait and see what actually makes it into the next set.
So basically they aren’t going to listen to the feedback and just serve up more hot garbage?
Or we can wait to see what changed before jumping to conclusions.
Imagine CG actually had a way to communicate with us.
Imagine waiting for the information they do communicate...."Kyno;c-2308736" wrote:
"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308729" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308618" wrote:
"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308562" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308489" wrote:
"khdelboy;c-2308481" wrote:
I’m more interested if they will revise the changes to the conquest especially the energy needed for one battle, lt that I have any much hope they will do so.
Also the new conquest toon. Not interested in Maul (it will be a long time before I go for LV and I wouldn’t bother with a mando faction for a while.)
There are changes coming, but I wouldn't expect to see things like that change, it will likely be around the feats and some organization things there. But we will have to wait and see what actually makes it into the next set.
So basically they aren’t going to listen to the feedback and just serve up more hot garbage?
Or we can wait to see what changed before jumping to conclusions.
Imagine CG actually had a way to communicate with us.
Imagine waiting for the information they do communicate....
