Conquest hard max reward

No matter what I've had equipped these last 2 GC's I can't get past Sector 4. The first 2 I was able to get to the end of sector 5, couldn't beat it, but got to it.

"twstdbydsn;c-2270437" wrote:
No matter what I've had equipped these last 2 GC's I can't get past Sector 4. The first 2 I was able to get to the end of sector 5, couldn't beat it, but got to it.

GCs are one thing and Conquest is another. GC=/= Conquest.

Games, Capital :)

"Kyno;c-2270481" wrote:

"twstdbydsn;c-2270437" wrote:
No matter what I've had equipped these last 2 GC's I can't get past Sector 4. The first 2 I was able to get to the end of sector 5, couldn't beat it, but got to it.

GCs are one thing and Conquest is another. GC=/= Conquest.

They are both GC's I can't help it they aren't creative enough with the names that the acronyms are the same. And in a thread about Conquest, I think you knew what I meant.

Yeah, I think the new "Galactic Battles: War" technical name, when the name has been Galactic War forever just makes Galactic Conquest the natural name for "Galactic Battles: Conquest"...which invites GB:C to be abbreviated GC in the same way that GB:W is still abbreviated GW.

I'm not saying that's good, but I think that whatever you prefer, Kyno, we're going to end up seeing a lot of it. It is a sad thing which I wish CG had prevented.

Something like "Army Arena" for the overarching name of the table with "Galactic War" the name for one option & "Conquest" the name of the other would have been more convenient for clear communication.

To be clear, I'm not saying you're wrong to encourage people to notice the confusing nature of using GC here, I'm just saying that maybe your comment could be more gentle as this confusion isn't really of TWST's making.

Games, Capital

Also amusing.

"MasterSeedy;c-2271591" wrote:
Yeah, I think the new "Galactic Battles: War" technical name, when the name has been Galactic War forever just makes Galactic Conquest the natural name for "Galactic Battles: Conquest"...which invites GB:C to be abbreviated GC in the same way that GB:W is still abbreviated GW.

I'm not saying that's good, but I think that whatever you prefer, Kyno, we're going to end up seeing a lot of it. It is a sad thing which I wish CG had prevented.

Something like "Army Arena" for the overarching name of the table with "Galactic War" the name for one option & "Conquest" the name of the other would have been more convenient for clear communication.

To be clear, I'm not saying you're wrong to encourage people to notice the confusing nature of using GC here, I'm just saying that maybe your comment could be more gentle as this confusion isn't really of TWST's making.

Games, Capital

Also amusing.

Also, they called it Galactic Conquest to start.
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/241766/the-galactic-conquest-begins-soon
:p

"twstdbydsn;c-2270437" wrote:
No matter what I've had equipped these last 2 GC's I can't get past Sector 4. The first 2 I was able to get to the end of sector 5, couldn't beat it, but got to it.

To get past Sector 4 you need a GL OR a relic Empire team with TM removal/gain disks.

There isn’t another “easy” way.

I hope after the next conquest, they’ll refresh the bosses AND feats.

"khdelboy;c-2271770" wrote:

"twstdbydsn;c-2270437" wrote:
No matter what I've had equipped these last 2 GC's I can't get past Sector 4. The first 2 I was able to get to the end of sector 5, couldn't beat it, but got to it.

To get past Sector 4 you need a GL OR a relic Empire team with TM removal/gain disks.

There isn’t another “easy” way.

I hope after the next conquest, they’ll refresh the bosses AND feats.

I’ve had success with gas/501st subbing Ashoka for either rex or arc. R7 gas and 5s r5 on everyone else.

Sector 4 boss is easily done by CLS team, you will get TM removal feat with them.

"DEATHER;c-2271836" wrote:
Sector 4 boss is easily done by CLS team, you will get TM removal feat with them.

Not if your CLS team is modded well - you kill them too fast. I don't think I've ever completed that feat with CLS


ETA: I just ran it twice with my CLS (once at full and once at 90%) won both, got the feat neither time. If there was a counter, I would have some idea how close I was getting, but...CG.