Conquest hard mode

"MasterSeedy;c-2238739" wrote:

opposing bug fixes doesnt impact the fact that they will be changed and that change happening or not is not based on player feedback.

It doesn't change whether they're currently scheduled to be changed, but this test of GB:Conquest came with an invitation for player feedback with the idea that they can and will change things - things not yet specified - based on whatever feedback they get.

Whether I got my idea (about the way things ought to be) from a bug or from my imagination, I am currently advocating that they allow people to play to lose (or at least not play to win) to achieve certain feats, including the ones under discussion (total crits > x over a full conquest; total thermal detonators > y over a full sector, etc).

Most changes players advocate never come to pass, but they did invite feedback, and this is part of mine. All I care about is continuing to improve the game experience for everyone. Maybe CG will disagree with me and won't revisit their decision on how to construct the feats, but the fact that changes are unlikely to happen based on my feedback doesn't mean I shouldn't supply feedback to CG when asked.

So here I am, articulating my position. The next thing that should happen is in CG's hands, not yours or mine.

I understand and was not saying anything is in my control, I was just trying to make sure we are all aware that this is a bug, and that bugs get fixed. Players always have some feelings about bug fixes, one way or the other, but that doesnt change the fact that they will be changed to be in accordance with they way they should be when they are used in multiple areas.

Just trying to make everyone aware that it's not being ignored, when this situation arises, but is being handled in a consistent manner as other elements like this.