"shaun51422;c-2185257" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2185092" wrote:
"shaun51422;c-2185010" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2184561" wrote:
"shaun51422;c-2184489" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2184292" wrote:
Apparently they developed strong enough teams and tactics to gain top ranks. And you call their rosters useless?
The leader boards rank players by GAC score - not by roster strength. It's all it is. I wouldn't worry too much about how strong (or weak) the top ranking players' rosters are.
The point is that if they were going against the other good teams in the division they wouldn't win a match.
The point is that they were matched against players with similar matchmaking GP and won.
Exactly - they matched the teams that can't put together a decent team of 5 against other teams that can't put together a decent team of 5. They have the GP, so if they didn't use their resources well then they should have to deal with it.
Do you have any proof that they were matched by anything other than matchmaking GP, division and league? How does this matching by their ability to put together decent teams of 5 work?
Of course I don't have proof, but it's obvious to anyone that knows the game even a little and looks at the discrepancy in the players character level on the leader boards. And if it were totally random, then the odds of me playing 2 seasons in the same division and not facing an opponent with multiple high level characters would be 0.
The divisions are based on total gp. The matchmaking is based on the gp of double the number of characters placed on defense. In div 1 that is top 80. In the lowest division it is only top 30 since you only set 3 teams. I'm not sure what it is in div 9 but probably around 40 or 50.
So what is happening is that the guy that only has g11 as his highest has more of his roster below his top 40 or so geared for tb or whatever reason. Maybe he wants to gear everything when he can.
But since his top 40 are a lower gp than yours, he is matched with others in div 9 that has a similar top 40 go. That is how it works
