"shaun51422;c-2185257" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2185092" wrote:
"shaun51422;c-2185010" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2184561" wrote:
"shaun51422;c-2184489" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2184292" wrote:
Apparently they developed strong enough teams and tactics to gain top ranks. And you call their rosters useless?
The leader boards rank players by GAC score - not by roster strength. It's all it is. I wouldn't worry too much about how strong (or weak) the top ranking players' rosters are.
The point is that if they were going against the other good teams in the division they wouldn't win a match.
The point is that they were matched against players with similar matchmaking GP and won.
Exactly - they matched the teams that can't put together a decent team of 5 against other teams that can't put together a decent team of 5. They have the GP, so if they didn't use their resources well then they should have to deal with it.
Do you have any proof that they were matched by anything other than matchmaking GP, division and league? How does this matching by their ability to put together decent teams of 5 work?
Of course I don't have proof, but it's obvious to anyone that knows the game even a little and looks at the discrepancy in the players character level on the leader boards. And if it were totally random, then the odds of me playing 2 seasons in the same division and not facing an opponent with multiple high level characters would be 0.
Players are matched by matchmaking GP - not by "ability to put together decent teams". Players with weak rosters can still be matched with players with strong rosters from the same division and league as long as they have matching matchmaking GP.
If one day you find proof of matching by "ability to put together decent teams" feel free to post it here.
