Executor is a beast? [MERGE]

"Beeblebrox;c-2287359" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287275" wrote:

"Mirkraag;c-2287262" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287251" wrote:

"Heretosay;c-2287247" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287245" wrote:

"MaricSkywalker;c-2287240" wrote:
Have we gotten confirmation this is working as intended from the community manager yet?

No, and from my understanding they may be looking at things, but waiting on an official statement to that effect. (But I make no promises or anything of any sort of official thing of this statement)

I'm baffled they have beta testers I watch streamers accidentally reveal things all the time. This shouldn't be missed. I'm sorry if there is an unintended interaction with 2 really odd ships that's understandable, but this is the current meta.

You are jumping to conclusions, but that can be natural without actual knowledge of the situation.

Maybe we can just leave the speculation about the beta group out of this and provide some constructive feedback about the ship and the issues you have/see.

Sorry but he is right.

Dev actually teased ("sell") the ship as the next meta literally.
This ship has been beta tested. Two options : one is that they missed the point that the ship has a terrible AI in defense (so equivalent to not be beta tested at all). Option 2 CG was lying about the fact that it will be the next meta.

2 options, which one is the good one that I dont know.

Again, you can assume what you want, but no there are many many more options than that for what could have happened.

Assigning blame based on no knowledge of what happened doesnt help and is no way constructive. Please keep it constructive and provide feedback about the ship.

I disagree, I believe seriously questioning the existence and/or detail of the pre-release testing regime is extremely constructive for the future of the game and keeping any kind of trust with the paying players who are the ones keeping the game going - and this is in light of let's be honest not just this one issue of this nature but just the most recent in a very long string of post-release issues which point to significant problems with the 'testing' processes such as they are or the ability of those involved to perform those testing processes to a competent level!

Telling players to NOT question the testing processes and procedures after yet another release debacle is, I would argue, the unconstructive thing to be doing because the status quo clearly isn't working as intended!

Questioning, sure fine. But since no one here has any knowledge of how it works or what steps are involved, assigning blame is in no way constructive to this situation. Nor is it helpful in any way.