Executor is a beast? [MERGE]

"Starslayer;c-2287601" wrote:

"Gascharack;c-2287598" wrote:
Hey guys, just wanna show you this:

https://youtu.be/iXV60EgN-L0

Because of the turn order a 5-Star-Executor can auto a maxed 7-Star-Executor.

7-Star-Executor fleet is maxed with full 6 dot mod, the 5-Star-Executor fleet has only 2 six dot mods. The turn order of the fleet is much better at a 5-star Executor. It fits perfectly to fulfill the contracts. But for a 7-Star-Executor its harder to achieve the contract.

CG should adjust the turnorder to fits much better for the contracts

Unfortunately both fleets don’t have the same starters/ri. I found Xanadu at first ri much, much more efficient to speed up the contracts.
I’m not saying that you’re wrong though; just that the same video with identical line ups would speak louder. If you could, that would be awesome.

i will ask him tomorrow to set the same defense with XB as first RI. But the last fight with that line up was also a win on auto. But yeah, would speak louder with an identical line up

"HokieFiend;c-2287696" wrote:
Any intel on what's going on, Kyno? Are they planning on addressing this with any communication soon at least?

We are asking, but at this moment they are not going to make a statement. From my understanding they are monitoring and discussing.

The general conversation seems to be around what can be done, but nothing official at the moment.

I would ask for patience, but as many of us know, that is always in short supply, especially when they are being tight lipped on a topic.

"Heretosay;c-2287704" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287703" wrote:

"HokieFiend;c-2287696" wrote:
Any intel on what's going on, Kyno? Are they planning on addressing this with any communication soon at least?

We are asking, but at this moment they are not going to make a statement. From my understanding they are monitoring and discussing.

The general conversation seems to be around what can be done, but nothing official at the moment.

I would ask for patience, but as many of us know, that is always in short supply, especially when they are being tight lipped on a topic.

How about we get some patience when deciding how to deploy resources? Which are in far shorter supply!

Not if you manage them correctly.

"Kyno;c-2287706" wrote:

"Heretosay;c-2287704" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287703" wrote:

"HokieFiend;c-2287696" wrote:
Any intel on what's going on, Kyno? Are they planning on addressing this with any communication soon at least?

We are asking, but at this moment they are not going to make a statement. From my understanding they are monitoring and discussing.

The general conversation seems to be around what can be done, but nothing official at the moment.

I would ask for patience, but as many of us know, that is always in short supply, especially when they are being tight lipped on a topic.

How about we get some patience when deciding how to deploy resources? Which are in far shorter supply!

Not if you manage them correctly.

I'm sure all the people that whaled on this ship will thank you for your sage advice the next time an event like this comes around "/

Speak of the handsome devil...
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/248171/executor-update/p1?new=1

"ImaSmakya;c-2287709" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287706" wrote:

"Heretosay;c-2287704" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287703" wrote:

"HokieFiend;c-2287696" wrote:
Any intel on what's going on, Kyno? Are they planning on addressing this with any communication soon at least?

We are asking, but at this moment they are not going to make a statement. From my understanding they are monitoring and discussing.

The general conversation seems to be around what can be done, but nothing official at the moment.

I would ask for patience, but as many of us know, that is always in short supply, especially when they are being tight lipped on a topic.

How about we get some patience when deciding how to deploy resources? Which are in far shorter supply!

Not if you manage them correctly.

I'm sure all the people that whaled on this ship will thank you for your sage advice the next time an event like this comes around "/

As someone with a 7* executor, I am ok with that.

"Kyno;c-2287711" wrote:
Speak of the handsome devil...
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/248171/executor-update/p1?new=1

That was really fast. Like really fast.

My money is on a buff to the crew skill. Extra speed for better turn order and to make sure ht plays before opponents to avoid a deadly first salvo, maybe extra offense/prot just for the fun of it.

Ah.. CG testing their units before release - at it's best :)

"Heretosay;c-2287725" wrote:

"Starslayer;c-2287722" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2287711" wrote:
Speak of the handsome devil...
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/248171/executor-update/p1?new=1

That was really fast. Like really fast.

My money is on a buff to the crew skill. Extra speed for better turn order and to make sure ht plays before opponents to avoid a deadly first salvo, maybe extra offense/prot just for the fun of it.

My money is they wait til the new ship can make them money and hope all is forgotten. I don't know what you remember but they promised to fix the NS cheese on Kenobi. Kenobi's time alone is almost over at the top and nothing has changed.

1) They didn't promise to do that, they said changes were "likely."

2) Kenobi is still easily at the top, so my guess is they decided to not break anything further by trying to fix it.

If there's one thing we can for sure expect CG to deliver on, it's safeguarding the whales' investments into the new shiny.

This is literally Malak 2.0. Old stuff beats new shiny? TO THE RRRRRRRRRRRRRESCUE

Anything else is a problem? Deal with it lmao