Executor is a beast? [MERGE]

So characters/ships should reflect in power the amount of resources invested. So a day one unlock ship should now be unbeatable by 6-12 months and a fair amount of resources invested in male/nego. What a bunch of lies. It's only about locking some income for long time ftp players behind a wallet. You can take it. Not a dime on this shady strategies. Already there is a decline in income, it will only increase.

Just add a speed bonus to piett’s t8 ability and add breach or target lock ships can’t assist.

The most glaring problem is that the 5* is better than the 7* with the current Bounty Hunter ships. The fact the 7* gets eat up by nearly every fleet on defense isn't great either. Adding 5 speed to RC will fix the 7* performance issue.

"Themy;c-2287731" wrote:

"Zanir;c-2287729" wrote:
If there's one thing we can for sure expect CG to deliver on, it's safeguarding the whales' investments into the new shiny.

This is literally Malak 2.0. Old stuff beats new shiny? TO THE RRRRRRRRRRRRRESCUE

Anything else is a problem? Deal with it lmao

This is such a stupid statement, in ALL games like this new toons must be able to beat older toons or else there is no incentive to spend money. When it all boils down this game is run by a business whose job it is to turn a profit. They don't make a profit if everyone refunds their money spent on a character that is not living up to the marketing hype that the company put out.

Sure, which is why testing your new character (or ship) before release is a good idea but here we are yet again...

"We need to nerf GL counters for future game balance" (trust us we know what we're doing)
"The community have discovered after one hour, that the Executor is under performing" (actually we don't have a clue)

I'm not sure who trusts CG, even I don't...

"TVF;c-2287770" wrote:
I'm not sure who trusts CG, even I don't...

For once, I agree with you, CG deserve zero respect or trust

Correct me if I'm wrong, the general feeling is that it can beat everyone on offence and is not unbeatable on defence when the AI takes over.

If that's not as CG intended it to perform, does that mean they actually want it to be unbeatable on defence?

That's so far down the wrong path if so. Just my opinion. If you have one character that is unbeatable, its not Galaxy of Heroes, its just Galaxy of Hero.

And this is why my wallet will stay closed for this game from now on. It doesn’t matter how much you invested in the past, if it breaks their shiny new toys they will make sure it gets nerfed. Before anyone else says it, a nerf is more likely than a buff as soon power creep will make other parts of the game unviable.

"Ravens1113;c-2287781" wrote:

"TVF;c-2287736" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2287735" wrote:

"Themy;c-2287731" wrote:

"Zanir;c-2287729" wrote:
If there's one thing we can for sure expect CG to deliver on, it's safeguarding the whales' investments into the new shiny.

This is literally Malak 2.0. Old stuff beats new shiny? TO THE RRRRRRRRRRRRRESCUE

Anything else is a problem? Deal with it lmao

This is such a stupid statement, in ALL games like this new toons must be able to beat older toons or else there is no incentive to spend money. When it all boils down this game is run by a business whose job it is to turn a profit. They don't make a profit if everyone refunds their money spent on a character that is not living up to the marketing hype that the company put out.

Omega says hi

Omega is a marquee, nice try.

“In all games like this, new toons must be able to beat older toons or else there is no incentive to spend money”

Doesn’t specify marquee or otherwise. Specifically saying new toons must beat old toons. So my statement stands to prove the original comment incorrect that new toons do not need to defeat all old toons.

If you want to completely ignore the context of the post in order to somehow win internet points for an obvious statement, congrats I guess.