Executor unlock method concerns.. Confirmed

"Kyno;c-2284328" wrote:

"Drathuk916;c-2284261" wrote:
Kyno

So I see a few issues with your position. As it relates to comparing executor to mt and wicket, the announcement they made when they moved them to nodes, iirc, was at least a tacit if not explicit admission that introducing a character this way was a failure. I won’t go digging for the announcement but you’re welcome to prove my recollection wrong. Though the fact we have never seen a character introduced like that again is supportive of my recollection.

Also, while nightsisters could briefly hold their own in the arena, they were definitely not THE meta team as executor is being portrayed to be. Wicket was obviously never meta though key to a legendary though still not as important as executor is being represented.

Furthermore, just because they have done year long farms in the past whether that is finalizer/raddus or slightly less time with gas/malak from starting prerequisites to 7*, doesn’t mean it was acceptable then or especially acceptable now.

Finally, just take a look at your improvements over the past year. For me, they are jkl, rey, jml, slkr, and jmk/cat. Would it even remotely make sense for me to still be working on all of those by completing a once a month event over and over. Obviously not. Gear checks are no problem, giving whales 3-6 months advantage over ftp is fine, but taking 1-2 years to max executor while having such an unprecedented gear check for a cap ship is not.

Correct, holding to the 2 year pattern was not a good idea, and I agree that they may have said something to that affect, which I believe supports my point that while this cadence seems slow at first, it will change or some other change will happen at some point, to allow this ship to be gained in less than 2 years.

I never said this ship wasnt important or being portrayed in any way (good or bad), so I'm not sure what the point is there.

I never said or tried to make a point either way on what someone should find acceptable.

Ok, thank you for your feedback, I understand where you are coming from.

I was just adding to my belief that a comparison of what they did with mt and wicket isn’t a good comparison. Did not mean to imply you suggested executor wasn’t important.

Also, while I could see your argument being valid for RC when it was introduced for conquest as it was the first ship/character introduced this way, executor is the third advanced fleet to be introduced and though it was improperly suggested that the cadence changed for finalizer/raddus it has not. So are track record with cg is them admitting a mistake with mt wicket and sticking to their release cadence with finalizer/raddus.

It took months for cg to change course with mt and wicket even with the immediate reaction of the community. The community reacted the same way to finalizer/raddus but cg never altered course and the community accepted the farm because they were completely unneeded cap ships that only had minor impacts on gac/tw/Tb and zero on fleet arena. This won’t be the case for executor if executor is as advertised.

I do believe you’re correct that it won’t be two years to complete the farm, but I disagree that if the community doesn’t raise hell about the absurdity of the presently announced cadence cg will change it on their own.