"niko4;c-2256529" wrote:
I understand that it can be difficult for us to compare shards but I like where this is going Kyno . You do have the most difficult fleet shard I have seen so far and that's why I would at least like to see your top 50. And same for DarjeloSalas if interested in sharing still.
That alone shows you are not an outlier, which does kind of mean there is no reason for them to take any action.
"niko4;c-2256529" wrote:
Reviewing a single person's fleet battles per day and ranking over an amount of time should be sufficient to see how they would do in my shard as I have a database of over 200 players in my shard. Yes, I climbed around and collected that... If you can stay near top 50 with 3 or so battles per day, you are obviously not the same as ours.
Not without know a lot more details about when the shard is created.
And judging by a single person is not really that helpful to the grande view of a shard, but I guess it will give a limited view.
Not all shards are the same, and I would imagine that any shard created after the first few days of shops opening, and went the more normal way of creation is going to be different, and that's ok.
Being an outlier in this situation is going to be linked to a sub set of the whole.
"niko4;c-2256529" wrote:
Helps determine active population. If someone who quit a month ago and sits in top 200 still, that would reflect the active amount of players in a shard.
To some extent, that would be a valid point, but again because jumps get larger as you move out, someone can just be in a spot that isnt seen as much and it doesnt paint the whole picture.
