GA encouragement

"Scuttlebutt;c-1811614" wrote:

"cannonfodder_iv;c-1810875" wrote:

"Bubblechomp;c-1810761" wrote:

Again, this is not about me. Perhaps you glossed over the example I posted above where my friend’s opponent has 20 LESS G11/12’s, and 20 LESS zetas. That’s not fair, that’s a joke.

Your friend's opponent isn't on the forums complaining about matchmaking. You are.

You proposed one narrow solution that doesn't consider a lot of factors that would need to be considered and you've ignored reasonable questions that have been asked, sometimes outright and sometimes by one-line deflections like the one above.

You're seem upset and uninterested in solving a problem, just airing a grievance and proposing faux solutions with over simplification.

Adjust the GP calculation so that higher tiers of gear count for more based on their relative strength?

I think there are a lot of options like this that could be useful and lead towards more equitable matches. The GP genie has already left the bottle so to speak and modifying the formula would change the goal posts for things like TW matching and TB deployment calculations. Changing that would cause unnecessary havoc. That said, I think you can make a strong argument for using an alternative calculation for determining a unit's efficiency as opposed to just it's "development". Said differently, Gear level GP contributions don't accurately reflect the benefit to in-game effectiveness and are over-inflated by things like character level and crew power.