GA Fleet Imbalance

"Stokerini;c-1780230" wrote:
GA is a combination of strategy and squad/fleet strength. Either can be ignored to your detriment. I did not intend this posting to be about strategy. There are other places in the forums dedicated to that.


This was meant to talk about advantages/disadvantages in GA. I think my point has been made pretty clearly that a high relative ratio of fleet power to squad power (both with a singular fleet and in aggregate) can be a disadvantage. This is an imbalance. Skill/strategy can overcome imbalances, but it doesn’t negate the fact the imbalance exists.

As previously stated, you made several points in your original post including:

"Stokerini;d-195418" wrote:
If you have a very strong fleet then you are automatically disadvantaged in GA.



Otherwise those of us who have focused on fleets will never win a GA that includes fleets which seems to be the opposite of what was intended for GA fleets.

This is from your own original post. I don't agree with this. Having a very strong fleet is an advantage. Players with very strong fleets can win as well in GA. Without my strong fleet I would only have won 2/3 in the recent GA. My strong fleet won me the 3rd victory as well. Without it I would probably have lost.

(Yes, having a lot of fluff GP ships in your fleet is a disadvantage, but that's beside your point, I believe)

Ok, carry on discussing your other points.

Edited. Added:

I notice that you changed your wording. In your original post the wording was a very strong fleet will automaticaly put you at a disadvantage (I disagree), whereas your new wording is, that it can be a disadvantage (a lot of things can be a disadvantage, so I can't really argue with this).