"Wed_Santa;c-2458208" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2458181" wrote:
"Wed_Santa;c-2458177" wrote:
Any aspect of the game can be a tactical opportunity- it’s up to you to have a bit of fun with it or to make it a frustration.
It sounds like OP's schedule does not allow him to utilize the tactical opportunity of his choosing. If I had more fun or felt better going 1st/2nd but my schedule didn't allow it, that would be frustrating. And I might saunter over to the forums and make a post about my preferences and see if it gains any traction... and then lose faith in humanity ;)
But isn’t that the point? You don’t choose tactical opportunities- you choose strategies. Tactical opportunities are what the objective conditions offer you.
Of course the OP has every right to vent when the conditions don’t suit their chosen strategy but the point I was trying to make is that, rather than asking for a change to reduce the impact of the conditions faced as an individual on their personal strategy by removing sight of scores for all of us, they might be better looking for ways to find tactical opportunities instead. It’s the categorical imperative really.
Time zones aren’t a personal strategy. We all live in time zones. Time zones are themselves a categorical imperative. We all abide by them categorically. We cannot change them unless you’re suggesting we move to the best time zone to play the game to make use of the tactical opportunity. Or maybe get a night job. I’m asking to be given the chance to remove the tactical opportunity that exists for some but not others. Simply to level the playing field. I’m somewhat surprised that’s controversial. In that way, personal strategy as you put it has more stake in the outcome than a tactical opportunity based on a zip code. Given the outcry, sounds like most people won’t hide their scores anyway. I mean it’s not an advantage right?