GAC matchmaking is wack
OK, I know the matchmaking in GAC is a little wack, has weird and unknown ruled. But it's really going out of bounds. I am a F2P 2.69M player in Division 4 (1.49M characters, 1.2M ships), and got to p...
Forum Discussion
"Akenno;c-2075718" wrote:"Darth_DeVito;c-2075143" wrote:"AlexTRoopeR;d-225402" wrote:
Could he be a spender so the game gives him good matches to keep him happy. Or to punish me for not spending? Is this the direction of the game? Matches predetermined?
As a spender, my matches are ridiculous too. My meta-ish teams with 3 or more relic characters are Padme, JKR, GG and CLS. My current opponent has all of those plus DRM, as well as vastly more g12 characters and more zetas.
If anything, you only shoot yourself in the foot by spending larger amounts of money on this game because your zetas and your mod collection don't keep up with your rapidly growing GP. At this point, my F2P opponents have 2 years of experience on me. 2 more years of mod and zeta farming make one hell of a difference.
Thats true! They should change the matchmaking and make it based upon GAC points in general.
Why matching people twice around GP? You do the GP seperation for the divisions. Now do the matchmaking based upon points.
I have thought about that to be appropriate. It would make sense for the higher ranks to fight each other, not those 400k below.
I am a spender, although I get the matchup with many opponents 400k+ but their rosters and placements are not very good. The harder opponents for me have usually been closer to my gp
