GAC Matchup Discrepency
So this GAC I've gone 3-0, 1-2 (barely), 3-0, and I'm currently 0-2. This seems wrong to me? (as if the game is wildly overcompensating after each round of 3) So much so I'm now considering throwin...
Forum Discussion
"Keydash1;c-1997884" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-1997771" wrote:
But it’s GA3 into GA4 that separates things out. To get into Aurodium after 9 matches you need to be averaging just over 2600 per match. Feats reduce that slightly, but we’re talking at most 2 defeats here to make it there.
And that’s the reality. Those who make Aurodium after GA3 are all matched together. And they’ll have at least a 7&2 record or better. That’s why GA4 typically sees the toughest matchups for the most successful players.
I think you're vastly underestimating the points from feats. I don't remember how many feat points I got this week, but going into Week 4 I had a 6-3 record and 26943 points (minus this week's feats). That's 3443 more than needed for Aurodium. I would still have made Aurodium for week 4 with a 3-6 record and the same banners. (or 4-5 if I actually got >443 feat points this week.)
You're the outlier though - the vast majority of people in Aurodium after GA3 are going to be 6-3 or better, if only because they can't move up to Kyber by that point. 100% of people who are 9-0, 8-1, 7-2, and 6-3 are in Aurodium, and those people will greatly outnumber the handful of people that used feats to move up.
