GAC Tiebreaker
Is it just me or is the GAC tiebreaker needing a review. I’m going to lose because I have the lower GP. I think the lower GP player should be rewarded for being the underdog and competing with...
Forum Discussion
"Nikoms565;c-2191993" wrote:"Camdent13;c-2191990" wrote:"Waqui;c-2191950" wrote:"Camdent13;c-2191948" wrote:"Waqui;c-2191887" wrote:
Total GP is irrelevant for your chances to win a round so why do you consider yourself the underdog? You and your opponent have matching relevant GP.
The underdog comment was just simply because I had the lower GP.
If that's true why should you "be rewarded for being the underdog and competing with the higher GP player" (your words)?
Because in the end someone has to take the tie breaker and giving it to someone who has 300k more GP than me seems like the wrong way to go.
But that 300k more GP didn't have any effect on the outcome. So perhaps think of it as a nod to the player who has the slightly more well-rounded roster?
But by that theory why are we rewarding a player with a “more well rounded roster” with the win when he clearly underperformed and tied someone with a lesser GP.
