"JohnnySteelAlpha;520199" wrote:
"Satirist;520111" wrote:
Why is it so darn difficult for the devs to understand player feedback on GW? The playerbase's opinion on GW is unanimous and unequivocal and overall not hard to understand. You say you monitor play feedback? Then monitor this:
GW is an incredibly boring, tedious, annoying and aggravating chore that takes ages to complete and provides absolutely no entertainment value whatsoever. No one enjoys it, no one wants it. The only reason people still do GW, is because they have to, if they want to stay competitive.
The whole concept of GW is broken beyond repair. One of the main reason people like GoH, is because it doesn't take a buttload of time to play on a competitive level. (Hint: sim tickets) How could you possibly think people enjoy retreating from the same battle for two dozen times, just so they can finally beat GW?
Just to counter that - soon as GW was changed to be easy there were multiple threads that went up complaining that it was too easy. Me personally, I like that it's not as hard - but to say that no one liked it the old was is totally not correct. There were actually a decent chunk of players that liked the challenge.
There were but we effectively flamed all those players complaining it was too easy. So they all quit the game. Ergo there aren't any players left that liked the hard gw
