Grand Arena Championship Update [MEGA]
"CG_SBCrumb;d-211725" wrote: Hi Holotable Heroes, The Grand Arena Championships Exhibition has wrapped up and we wanted to take this moment to reflect on the gameplay experience and where we want...
Forum Discussion
3 Things.
1.) Bulldog hack alt is still at large and until you guys prove that you have anti cheating capabilities by banning that account (and returning the original account back to play status) your anti-cheating game integrity statement is a joke. You are just trying to bully the reporters to keep things hush hush. No $$ for you CG.
2.) Locking down GAC shop (tier sensitive stuff) every GAC is ridiculous. Please make that shop 1 time unlock only. So that players may utilize the shop for the items they want.
3.) Using GP as a tie breaker is also a BAD idea. The higher GP player already has a big advantage by having that much more roster to use in play (as a reward for them going "wide" on their account development). While, I don't agree with the approach, I understand the reasoning behind it. We don't want to penalize players who built their account a certain way (so YOU choose to penalize the other player by putting him/her at a disadvantage? why?) but ok. So on top of that you now give that player even MORE advantage by using GP for tie break. Really guys, not very fair. If anything, the player with the smaller GP should win in the rare circumstance that there is a tie.
1.) Bulldog hack alt is still at large and until you guys prove that you have anti cheating capabilities by banning that account (and returning the original account back to play status) your anti-cheating game integrity statement is a joke. You are just trying to bully the reporters to keep things hush hush. No $$ for you CG.
2.) Locking down GAC shop (tier sensitive stuff) every GAC is ridiculous. Please make that shop 1 time unlock only. So that players may utilize the shop for the items they want.
3.) Using GP as a tie breaker is also a BAD idea. The higher GP player already has a big advantage by having that much more roster to use in play (as a reward for them going "wide" on their account development). While, I don't agree with the approach, I understand the reasoning behind it. We don't want to penalize players who built their account a certain way (so YOU choose to penalize the other player by putting him/her at a disadvantage? why?) but ok. So on top of that you now give that player even MORE advantage by using GP for tie break. Really guys, not very fair. If anything, the player with the smaller GP should win in the rare circumstance that there is a tie.
