"SenorPompo;c-2446116" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2446114" wrote:
"SenorPompo;c-2446113" wrote:
I wholeheartedly disagree. I also dispute the “occasionally” statement. Those matchups are the regular, and balanced and close matchups (within 500k GP) are few and far between.
As we learned when GP was how they did MM, GP is a terrible gauge of a close matchup.
Like I said above, it’s certainly far from perfect. But a system that comes down to “did your opponent with a massive GP advantage attack? If so, you lose” is an inferior system imo.
Well, assuming you are 924921329, when you beat someone almost 4M GP higher than you and that person did attack... *shrug*
But either way, what we have now is far superior to the system that actively encouraged people to not grow their rosters and game the system.