Health Equalization is Designed Incorrectly
I was having a discussion with McMole after he had explained in his video about how the mechanic works. This applies to Geonosians and Malak as far as I know. When the character "equalizes" health...
Forum Discussion
"nabokovfan;c-1926457" wrote:"KausDebonair;c-1926393" wrote:"nabokovfan;c-1926227" wrote:"KausDebonair;c-1926146" wrote:
OH!
Ok, now I understand what you’re saying. You’re saying if one toon loses 2k, they should equalize off of only that 2k. Not the percentage that 2k was of the toon’s max health. I gotcha now.
Yes, I agree with that, in some cases.
Glad it finally made sense, what do you mean by some cases?"Juzz;c-1926224" wrote:
So basically you want to change the ability to something else because you don't like how it is...
I vote for deathmark to not do as a taunt also. Maybe some will agree with me, but that's not how the ability goes. I surely have the same success as you: none
Please read the discussion, I don't think you understand.
It makes sense to have percentage equalization as long as there’s an additional thing attached to it, like Chirrut’s HoTs or HYoda’s additional 20% heal.
Exactly, but that's not what we're talking about here. We are specifically talking about 3 abilities in the game that are worded very different than the others.
They're worded almost exactly the same, but when the ability includes a heal they mention that the equalization is percentage based where as they don't mention that if the ability only equalizes. It's consistant.
If you think Barriss', HODA's and Chirrut's abilities make sense, so should brood's. Afterall, they're healing like maniacs, just with a different ability.
