*right ftfy.
Again why is it okay for him to fight for 1 all day, and everyone else in the shard not to? What if there was no shard chat, and everyone else saw him sticking to 1 or 2 all day and independently decided to fight him? That's fine then? What's the difference. Also, the point of arena isnt to get 1 or 2 all day, its only in your payout hour. Thinking it's unfair for a group to check someone's behavior that's wrong is just unbelievable. Let's say this guy is in 1 for his payout and gets it. Great. Then the next payout there's 2 people who grab 1 and 2, but this guy snipes 2 before they get their payout. That's not unfair to do that, when the problem person doesn't get their payout for 23 more hours?
If you were at a grocery store and the checkout line was really long, and someone just cut the line and said "those are my conditions ", you really wouldn't expect the group of people to say or do something? JFC
Against my better judgement but hell, got some time to kill
I guess the answer is no, you didn't read anything. YES its fine if everyone attacks him to regain their position. NO its not okay to coordinate an attack to get him out of top 20 because he doesn't want to play according to your rules. YES its stupid to want to be nr 1 all day long, but again, not your decision to make and ALLOWED by the game..... Sure if you fight him for place one and he drops and keeps dropping thats OK because thats how pvp works.
And if you really payed attention in my previous post you would understand that i don't think its reasonable for the guy to demand thathe stays nr1 or 2 all day...
the point of arena isnt to get 1 or 2 all day, its only in your payout hour.
This is the shards point of view, not the games point of view, game says you get reward based upon your position at payout time. Doesn't care what you do in the meantime otherwise it wouldn't allow crystal refreshes. **bleep**ty thing to do but unless cg disables fighting in a period before your payout its allowed by the game
Not my president, but thats an entire different topic.
Ok, so show me where it says you cannot attack other people to gain nr 1 in the rules? (**bleep**ty thing to do but unless your nr 1 you can keep attacking everyone in front of you. Its stupid to want to do that sure. And to be fair, yes the group can try and reason with him, if that fails i does not give the group the right to say he's not gonna be in top 20 anymore simply because he doesn't follow our strategy. I'm fine with attacking him back one on one, but to me organizing to attack somebody to get him out is bullying him. Thats my point of view
lets say its a running competition, it doesn't make sense for a runner to sprint from the start and/or everytime somebody passes him. It only makes sense to do so at the finish line. But if the guy decides, you know what, i'll be first from start to finish, its not allright for the rest of the runners to gang up on him and try to trip him or knock him. You just let him run out of steam, take turns tiring him out and in the end you beat him at the finish line
He can do what he likes.
As for your current President you got him from voter apathy. Do you really want to keep persevering with these weak comparisons that fall down to any kind of scrutiny?
Of course it’s allowed both ways, however you can guarantee that only one player will be laughing whilst 20 plus clutch their pearls because they can’t rise above it.
I'm sure theyre laughing as they spend more crystals then they get paid out. Sounds like a fun way to play a game. Trolling people 20 hours a day.
This is off topic but I didn't vote for him. Thank god this person is the shard arbitrarily decided they deserve 2nd for 23 hours a day though.
Capital Games TeamCapital Games Team
