"Telaan;239348" wrote:
"JoshG;239322" wrote:
@Telaan
In the arena what % of matches would you estimate you currently lose vs Dooku(L) teams?
I don't keep track. It's not often. I can't remember the last time I finished outside the top 3. I made it very clear my beef isn't about winning or losing. It's about the implementation of a mechanic that results in even more loss of what little skill is involved in this game.
Changes like what they did to RG are great and healthy for the game. It adds a new layer of strategy that doesn't allow you to just nuke one toon after the other. RG interrupts the flow of a match and requires at least a little thought into the use of specials.
The current incarnation of dodge is dummy proof. Throw any of the fast, heavy hitting toons we all already use behind him and boom....they're even better than before.
Where I could get behind the potency of dodge in its current form is if it was restricted, in it's full amount, to a specific class (i.e. Jedi).
Don't you think it requires a higher level of skill to sustain a good winning percentage when RNG variance is high compared to not? There's no way that winning in higher RNG state = less skill. If you can still win when RNG hits you in the face with bad variance, that's a huge demonstration of skill in your team setup and also in game tactical decisions. You can't be arguing that more skill was required when battles were easily predictable. I disagree that more RNG necessarily reduces skill required to win.
You can't make a claim that winning now is just RNG and less about skill and then at the same time say that you're winning at a high rate still. So what do you call your wins when RNG goes really bad against you? When RNG is not in your favor? Can't be luck. Luck's against you. Has to be skill no?
Capital Games Team
