In defense of CG (calm down people)

"EyeG_80ate;c-1586918" wrote:

"Nikoms565;c-1586874" wrote:
The system is set up to make strong guilds either internally fight over top 10 rewards or split up

I have yet to see any evidence of this (and it seems unlikely to be a problem). Guilds will either A) set up a rotation for top 10 (assuming everyone is capable of similar damage numbers and are reasonable humans). 2) If the guild is being carried by a few people with all the best teams, those carrying the guild deserve the top 10 spots (and anyone that thinks otherwise is just being silly)

As long as there's no guild who can 10-man HSTR you can make an argument that top 10 is carried... Neither can make it happen but discussion about it means the line has been drawn which is bad.

More OT - I can give a break to a game I paid 60 bucks for. I can wait for a fix in a game I paid 60 bucks up front and then 15 per month.
A studio which is boasting how their game is among the top grossing in 100 billion dollar industry and degrades player experience with each "fix" can expect nothing less than being called out. Especially when bugs which could be noticed after a single basic playthrough are affecting community even more.
Another thing is devs, community managers being bashed on forums. This indeed isn't fair, but then again - it's their job. Same as QA job is to prevent them being bashed in the first place.

Anyone who works for a corporation knows the drill. "Passion", "Courage", "Customers first" are just buzzwords. Spreadsheets are what matters and your paycheck at the end of the months. You can't expect more really.