Is it against the terms of service
To have an arena shard and coordinate hitting non shard members down so that only shard members can reach top 5? These guys are instantaneously licking non shard members out just to be jerks. They are...
Forum Discussion
"Kyno;c-2086743" wrote:"BobcatSkywalker;c-2086741" wrote:"ZAP;c-2086728" wrote:"BlackIrish;c-2086727" wrote:
I'm against shard mafias. I don't think EA does enough or anything to discourage or stop them.
Do you have any suggestions on how CG could stop it?
Random shard shuffle monthly. But keep limit the movement so people are always in a shard with others who started within the same 60 days to prevent new players from getting matched in shards with 4yr old accounts would help.
If people start setting up monthly shard chats then do the shuffle weekly. It can be a auto run job on their servers and takes 0 effort once set up.
how do you handle the regrouping? what order are they placed in?
also, dont you think the current shard setup benefits F2P more than anyone, they know the opponents they need to beat and have built up enough to do so. wouldn't this kind of shuffle hurt F2P more than anyone?
Edit to add:
What considerations are paid to the current balances established in shards -
- ratio of players in each PO
- F2P vs $$ players
- activity level
Shards are not balanced at all by f2p vs p2w, activity level, or payout times. They are random based on when you joined.
Some shards have lots of p2w, some have lots of inactives, some have lots of 6pm payouts. If you think CG balances the shards for any of these things your wrong.
