Levi is the worst meta ever!

"12Angry_Minh;c-2440237" wrote:
A few things first ... I created this forum account after playing since 2017. I've been 100% FTP and saw no reason to voice opinion until now. Being FTP is for context only.

Now to my two cents ...

Leviathan is far from unbeatable using profundity. Compared to before the unnecessary buff, I'm doing around the same versus leviathan in fleet arena although tactics needed adjustment. After adjustment, I call Biggs for reinforcement, Biggs deal, right?

I don't have leviathan but will 6* or 7* next event. Why? It's a relevant fleet.

What bothers me is the buff it was given outside of its kit to appease spenders. Taking 1st easily wasn't enough. You all wanted and expected to take 1st, hold it without opposition all on AI decision making (auto battle offense and defense AI). No competition unless your opponent spent more if not something to win against you. CG caved and buffed an already meta fleet (on offense).

Before the unnecessary buff, my shard didn't see leviathan fleets outside of top 10 while we had less than 10 and now they don't fall beyond top 20 with at least 13 7*.

I'm not complaining about ranks. I take 1st using profundity. So, those saying it can't be done are very wrong.

What bothers me most is that after I get leviathan to 7*, I need to deal with mirror battles instead of a hard counter unless I climb with profundity. Either case isn't a hard counter and there should be one regardless of "meta defining" interpretations. Leviathan met that interpretation by me before it was buffed and I still planned to acquire it in my time.

In the end, all I'm trying to say is that leviathan has been bad for the game since it was launched. For the health of the game, CG should consider releasing monstrosities like leviathan with an alternative hard counter at the same time.

Choice is important.