Forum Discussion
5 years ago
"Darth_Pepé_8008;c-2102232" wrote:"Gifafi;c-2102214" wrote:
why do people keep using the total number of chars that need stunguns when they are trying to make a point? Just use the number of good chars that need them and the point will still be made and no one will say "You don't have to gear all of them/IG86/ugnaught/etc."
Seems you are completely unable to understand that your way of playing this game is not the only way.
It's a collecting game, we can agree on that right. So using all needed is absolutely an argument.
Not everybody goes for the new and shiny, some actually collect factions or characters they like from a very varied amount of sources.
Oh, I completely understand, which is why I said: Why do people keep using the total number of chars that need stunguns when they are trying to make a point? Just use the number of good chars that need them and the point will still be made and no one will say "You don't have to gear all of them/IG86/ugnaught/etc."
I'll try and be more clear. When someone says "Wahhh I need eleventy XYZ's to have my entire roster completely maxed out right now," no one will, or does, care, at all. It makes it seem like a completely fake complaint. When you point out that there is an actual bottleneck of Stuns/etc, on needed toons that are not only viable in-game, but actually good, or needed for new shiny/meta chars, it highlights the fact that there is still a big crunch for stunguns, despite their "easing the crunch." You want to be a completionist and have every toon maxed, great, have at it. All I was saying is that if you want anyone to care, make the better point with a more persuasive argument.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.77,328 PostsLatest Activity: 13 days ago
Related Posts
Recent Discussions
- 51 minutes ago
- 3 hours ago
- 7 hours ago