"Lor_San_Teka;c-2200906" wrote:
"DarthGlovoc;c-2200882" wrote:
"Lor_San_Teka;c-2200877" wrote:
I'm not a CG apologist by any stretch, but I don't see how the word "also" changes anything. The original descriptions was "if all allies are IT..." How does "also" change the makeup of 2 attackers, 1 tank, 1 support?
The also means that to receive any of the three lower clauses (offense, insight stacks, and revives) you have to have 2 attackers, 1 tank, and 1 support. It reduces his plug n play viability as a leader and restricts him to ITs, so if someone doesn't have full ITs and zetad his lead under miscommunicated pretenses they want their zeta back.
Yeah, still I don't get it. Leadership is role-specific for the 4 spots. Then Zeta adds some nice things for a full IT squad (which means those roles are still needed).
If I was gonna be upset about something, it's that his leadership is useless in dumb 3v3.
Trust me, I'm fully open some justified CG outrage. Just I don't see the interpretation here other than "bad reading comprehension."
Without the word also, it reads like you can put him as an imperial trooper leader with all support or all attackers to get the 2nd part of the leader ability.
But with also in there, he gives no bonuses at all unless they are 1 support, 2 attackers, and one tank.
Capital Games Team
