New matching making algorithm proposal

"Intrapidoo;c-1698842" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-1698837" wrote:
But that’s the point. If people merely register and set a defence, then don’t attack at all, they are disadvantaging their guild. Some top level guilds have clear rules that if you’re not going to be able to attack then you don’t join. No space for freeloaders.

And how on earth can you possibly claim that all 30+ of your defeats have been caused by the opponents intentionally leaving people out? There are plenty of examples (in the thread you’ve advised others not to contribute to) that show a massive GP mismatch when both guilds were fully signed up. The algorithm sucks - it is perfectly capable of producing a mismatch without the signup trick.

You are entitled to be bitter and angry about the failings of the matchmaking algorithm. But I don’t think you’re entitled to just spuriously make things up about why you’ve lost TWs.

Than answer me this, im in a 127million guild and our average opponents are 150m+ gp. We fill with 23-24 squads always. The whole system from the moment you join until the end is screwed up. The matchmaking algorythm sucks okay i understand but when you have holes that are exploitable and basically give you instant wins thats irritating. I would welcome anything that improves the system, but CG does nothing, thats why after every single tw start there are multiple reports of screwed up matchmaking and CG responds to none of them.

We have a fairly decent record and we regularly face guilds that have 15-25 mil GP more than us. (Our current two both had 20 mil GP on us) If you've actually lost 30+ out of the 50? TW's we've had then it might be you need to work on your strategy. See if you can join an alliance where they can help you with your offense and defense layout to better balance? There are a bunch of different setups and there are ways to create a winning strategy so you can be successful.