New Year, Old Traditions

"Kyno;c-2216661" wrote:

"Fingolfin26;c-2216658" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2216640" wrote:

"Iy4oy4s;c-2215981" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2215964" wrote:

"CosmicJ;c-2215962" wrote:

"Iy4oy4s;c-2215886" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2215835" wrote:
I would say Doja has something in the works, but at this point I have said this enough that even I dont believe it.

(Yes its true, but we can wait until we see it.)

Wow...CG, you know you messed up when Kyno is saying this. Quit lying to the man!

Doubt it's lies, just lower on the priority list.

Q&A's were ok but the format could be better. Maybe they could do a round table with a couple of the popular YouTubers. Get each YouTuber to collect questions from their respective communities then send a shortlist of the most popular ones to CG in advance so they are prepared.

I'd be keen to tune into that.

YouTuber questions are always boring and they play safe to get further exclusives,

and I don't see why you want to limit the freedom of anyone being able to ask a question with having the same importance to their question as the next person to select hand few who decide which questions are good enough to ask

It’s no different when CG picks and chooses which question to answer, both have the same outcome, but I would like to see CG use the youtubers/twitchers some....GWR has has their fun in the double suns for far to long. Spread the love.

And CG, be honest. If you never plan another Q&A again, just say so....stop stringing everyone along about it.

Yes they plan on doing another QA.

Yes it will be just as hated as it was before no matter the format or any other changes they could make.

I disagree, I think many would appreciate it if they took some difficult questions instead of only taking softball questions.

Then one qa in particular i remember them answering hard questions and essentially said no to the majority of things the community was wanting. Some of which went against what they had previously hinted such as the mace windu rework. They coupled that with basically no specifics about what they WERE doing.

So have an open and honest qa that does more than highlight the art department and only answer simple questions that paint them in an extremely positive light. Additionally when you tell us no, and essentially say you can't be bothered to do these things the community wants, be open regarding what you ARE doing instead.

And they will never be able to meet these types of requirements in QA, for various reasons, and even if they get close, others will hate on it for other reasons. This is all fine and good, but I stand by my previous statement.

They can't answer questions other than merely softballs and they can't be open about the direction they're moving? That sounds like an issue on their end, those are completely reasonable expectations.

Saying some will hate it if they have something resemble this is an empty statement. It's impossible to please everybody, we all know this, so stating this is in effect stating nothing, and is not in any way a reason for doing or not doing something