"Gifafi;c-2090200" wrote:
"KvotheQGBQG2;c-2090191" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2090181" wrote:
correct, "after they have run as a scheduled event for one year", is that calendar date to the end of time. if it is added any time in that span they have adhered to that statement.
Um... wut? That makes no sense at all. Stop just trying to make them "right" no matter what they do.
do you think it should be the exact time of day, exactly one year from first launch? serious q, bc I find this fascinating
Nah, just on the date. However, you bring up a good point. It could certainly be scheduled to be added at the time that the event would have gone live if it were being launched that day. That shouldn't be too hard to do. I hadn't considered that before. I just don't like the whole Gandalf approach of it arriving precisely when it intends to.
