Non GL vs GL
I have been playing this game from the beginning. Why. WHY are you pairing non GL rosters with GL rosters in GAC. It is impossible! I'm raging and proud of it because I'm right. Come at me you cowards...
Forum Discussion
"Rath_Tarr;c-2242187" wrote:"Kyp_Durron88;c-2242092" wrote:"Nikoms565;c-2241863" wrote:"Kyp_Durron88;c-2241737" wrote:
But if you don't have one, why are you paired with those who do? Making GAC possible, at the very least, would be a much better draw no?
No - first off, if you've been "playing since the beginning" why don't you have a GL? Second, there are non-GL counters to GL, so if you had made better decisions in building your roster (either for GLs or to counter them), you wouldn't have an issue with your GAC matchups.
GAC has been around for quite some time - how matchups are determined is fairly well understood and is fine.
Better question is why would I have a GL? Have you seen the requirements?
Yes, 300k GP worth of B-/C-squad toons taken to relics for my SLKR. But if you are facing one more more GLs then you must also have invested a comparable amount or resources to build up a comparable amount of GP."Kyp_Durron88;c-2242092" wrote:
Also, just because GAC has been around awhile does not mean I'm wrong. It's never been fair. All I'm asking is why?
1) You cannot ignore GP in matchmaking
2) It would be impractical to attempt to match rosters by specific characters
3) Roster and resource management is as much a part of the game as combat"Kyp_Durron88;c-2242092" wrote:
You say I'm wrong but you have nothing to back up your convictions. I was just paired with someone who has 2 maxed out GLs. How is that fair?
You are responsible for your roster development choices and the matchmaking mechanics have been known for 2 years.
1. I don't. What's your point?
2. That's not what I'm suggesting. Just put GL players in their own bracket and continue matching GP. Or, boost GL GP contribution to a more appropriate proportion.
3. Agreed. What's your point?
