"BentWookiee;c-1267810" wrote:
Come on people.. you complain if people do not respond and then complain if they do. If you read @CG_RyDiggs as condescending that is on you, communication in written form conveys no "emotions" the reader applies that themselves. :|
Maybe you should pay attention to the message without your rage goggles on? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6e39/c6e39e5ee3302e0a4c275c11caebcb7d11754e84" alt=""
Writing can absolutely convey emotion. In fact, most non-technical writing is usually rated by things like tone and the ability to convey emotion. It absolutely possible to convey condescension, which is what RyDiggs did here. Going to your consumer base and providing the kind of feedback presented in the response to me is either a blatant attempt to belittle/condescend ("let me explain this to you extra slowly") or the tone-deafness of someone who shouldn't be speaking to the consumer base.
It would've been simple to respond and say "Sorry if there was any confusion, but what I meant was that the platoon requirements for Hoth were not going to be changed, and we would consider the feedback as it relates to future maps." That would've been simple, direct, and not condescending. However, it would've required admitting a mistake -- albeit the simpliest, smallest kind, of miscommunication, which the devs here seem loathe to do (see, for example, the devs throwing the youtubers under the bus on the HRS 7* requirement).
Sadly, every time it looks like the devs start to improve communication, they then take several steps backwards.