"ElleMadara;798837" wrote:
"Tuftedpaper85;798823" wrote:
Are people seriously comparing Vader's aoe to wedge and lando's? Lando's devastating aoe is his only niche and it takes time to build up. Wedge's capabilities are borderline broken but they're his niche as well: start off strong but get weaker as the match goes on. Vader has loads of health and lots of utility so it makes no sense that they would give him an aoe that drops an 18k bomb. He can easily sit in the top 10 on your shard with the right team and no chatacter like that is broken and deserves a buff.
It takes time to build up? DUDE, Lando's AoE is BROKEN, it doesnt even has cooldown its free, and destroy ALL of the opponent's team in 2 turns, that doesnt even takes time to build up, it takes 2 turns to destroy the opponent with a 20K free AoE and Han's taunt, that is all GG Lando wins. It takes Vader 2 turns to destroy a SINGLE enemy with his combo, and if the opponent has Tenacity up Vader is useless. WEDGE doesnt get weaker as the match goes on he gains TM, Health and Speed as the match progress. Lando doesnt get weaker as the match goes on, HE GAINS DOUBLE DAMAGE THE SECOND TIME HE USES HIS AOE.
Lando is a one trick pony whose only niche is his devastating aoe and there's a lot of ways around that: ability block him, stun him, crit chance down, offense down. We're also getting more counters in the form of crit immunity and qui gon zeta lead, which I think is eventually going to become the nail in the coffin for lando.Wedge starts matches off very strong but has very little health and protection and so he's very easy to kill. He gains speed but loses offense as allies get damage so loses a lot of that initial punch.
Anyways I can't believe I'm defending wiggs and lando but my point is that you can't compare someone like vader to wiggs or lando. Neither of those two really do anything but cause heavy damage and they're very easy to kill once targeted; vader, however, is difficult to kill thanks to his tanky health pool and he drops loads of debuffs.
"ElleMadara;802576" wrote:
"NicWester;799975" wrote:
"xReDeMpx;799898" wrote:
At the very least they should change the name of vaders basic because there is nothing terrifying about vaders basic.
Completely maxed Vader that needs a offense up and crit to break a 10k basic LOL
┻┳|
┳┻|
┻┳|
┳┻|
┻┳|
┳┻| _
┻┳| •.•) the low damage on the basic
┳┻|⊂ノ is the price for everything else
┻┳|
"ElleMadara;799903" wrote:
"xReDeMpx;799891" wrote:
Rebels def are the easiest group to pickup and form a team that will dominate.
I've noticed a lot of people here have no idea how to think outside of the box lol
That's my point bro, Vader just needs a little buff and combo's with Palpatine (maybe an assist), lt bothers me that there are Lando Teams in Top 20 (Arena) and they didnt even have their Landos maxed out, They just choose Lando/Han/Wiggs and other 2 rebels AND THEY WIN (: Rebels were afraid of Vader and Palpatine (Without a Jedi like Luke the Rebellion would be doomed) and in this game is the opposite, l see Lando and Han in 1 team, and l know from the get go that my Empire team is doomed
You're talking about an ENTIRE Rebel team and then comparing them ONLY to Vader. That is bad reasoning.
Dude my point is... If simple Humans with blasters (like Rebels), are SUPER STRONG, THE ACTUAL META, why not the main star of franchise (Darth Vader), our main bad guy, the face of Star Wars... it makes no sense, put 1 on 1 Biggs vs Vader= Vader loose
Put Wedge vs Vader= Vader loose ( vs Lando, Leia or Chirrut... Vader loose).
Under palpatine lead vader can beat almost anybody one on one due to his self heal and tm gains